首页> 外文OA文献 >Subcutaneous immunoglobulin in lymphoproliferative disorders and rituximab-related secondary hypogammaglobulinemia: a single-center experience in 61 patients.
【2h】

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin in lymphoproliferative disorders and rituximab-related secondary hypogammaglobulinemia: a single-center experience in 61 patients.

机译:淋巴增生性疾病和利妥昔单抗相关的继发性低聚球蛋白血症的皮下免疫球蛋白:61例患者的单中心经验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy represents the standard treatment for hypogammaglobulinemia secondary to B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusion is an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment approach in primary immunodeficiencies but no extensive data are available on their use in secondary hypogammaglobulinemia, a frequent phenomenon occurring after treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in lymphoproliferative disorders. In this retrospective study we evaluated efficacy (serum IgG trough levels, incidence of infections/year, need for antibiotics) and safety (number of adverse events) of intravenous (300 mg/kg/4 weeks) vs subcutaneous (75 mg/kg/week) immunoglobulin replacement therapy in 61 patients. In addition, the impact of the infusion methods on the quality of life was compared. All patients were treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulin, and 33 out of them were previously treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Both treatments appeared to be effective in replacing Ig production deficiency and in reducing the incidence of infectious events and the need for antibiotics; subcutaneous immunoglobulin obtained a superior benefit when compared to intravenous immunoglobulin achieving higher IgG trough levels, lower incidence of overall infection and need for antibiotics; the incidence of serious bacterial infections was similar with both infusion ways. As expected, a lower number of adverse events was registered with subcutaneous immunoglobulin, compared to intravenous immunoglobulin, with no serious adverse events. Finally, we observed an improvement in health-related quality of life parameters after the switch to subcutaneous immunoglobulin. Our results suggest that subcutaneous immunoglobulin are safe and effective in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia associated to lymphoproliferative disorders.
机译:静脉内免疫球蛋白替代疗法代表继发于B细胞淋巴增生性疾病的低血球蛋白血症的标准治疗方法。皮下免疫球蛋白输注是治疗原发性免疫缺陷的一种有效,安全且耐受性良好的治疗方法,但尚无广泛的数据可用于继发性低聚球蛋白血症,这是在抗CD20单克隆抗体治疗淋巴细胞增生性疾病后发生的常见现象。在这项回顾性研究中,我们评估了静脉注射(300 mg / kg / 4周)与皮下注射(75 mg / kg / kg)的疗效(血清IgG谷水平,感染发生率/年,对抗生素的需求)和安全性(不良事件数)周)免疫球蛋白替代治疗61例。另外,比较了输注方法对生活质量的影响。所有患者均接受皮下免疫球蛋白治疗,其中33名患者先前接受静脉内免疫球蛋白治疗。两种治疗方法似乎都可以有效地替代Ig的产生不足,并减少感染事件的发生和对抗生素的需求。与静脉注射免疫球蛋白相比,皮下免疫球蛋白具有更高的IgG谷水平,更低的总体感染率和对抗生素的需求,因此具有更好的益处;两种输注方式的严重细菌感染发生率相似。正如预期的那样,皮下免疫球蛋白与静脉内免疫球蛋白相比,不良事件的发生率更低,没有严重的不良事件。最后,我们观察到改用皮下免疫球蛋白后与健康相关的生活质量参数得到改善。我们的结果表明,皮下免疫球蛋白对于伴有淋巴增生性疾病的低球蛋白血症的患者是安全有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号